1. Careers
Send to a Friend via Email

Your suggestion is on its way!

An email with a link to:


was emailed to:

Thanks for sharing About.com with others!

New "fiction expert" Rachel Sherman


Welcome to the Fiction Writing site at About.com! I'm your new "fiction expert," Rachel Sherman. I am looking forward to giving you my thoughts on writing fiction and the life of a fiction writer, from craft to the "business" of publishing. Of course there is never one way to make art, and many would insist that fiction writing cannot be taught at all, but I believe there are ways in which certain tools can inspire - and hopefully - improve a writer's work.  

Fiction Writing Spotlight10

Writing Lesson 1: Time on a page...

Sunday April 20, 2014

How does a reader know what is most important in a story? How can we, as writers, make it clear to the reader what to pay attention to?
Obviously, we can't capitalize or color the parts that we want readers to be especially aware of. We cannot use arrows or lights to signify what should hold weight. It is our job, as writers, to seamlessly show the reader what parts of a story are there as informational or logistical, and what parts are meant to have a deeper impact.
Writers rely on words and space, but the amount of words and the length of the space - the physical impression - not just the meaning of the words - can be used to a writer's advantage.  
Although it might seem obvious, we can often forget that when something is important in a story or novel, a significant amount of time is spent playing out that aspect of the narrative in-scene. When something is less important, fewer words are used to get the information across.
Our eyes work with our imagination - as we lose ourselves in a story, we are also cognizant of how a story is being told to us. Lots of information on one subject means that subject should be paid attention to. As writers, we need to think as readers. Therefore, remember this:
Time on a page = importance.
Often, especially in writing workshops, one hears, "show don't tell", but there are certainly times where telling, and not showing, is appropriate. Usually, when something is logistical, or there to simply forward the plot, or if a character is used as a device rather than as a substantial part of the story, writers will write in exposition to get these moments across, and therefore, "tell" the reader. 
A writer wants to "show" and not "tell" when they want the reader to pay attention. Moments that hold weight should be expanded upon, and made into scenes.
In the editing process, try going back and making sure that nothing that is unimportant is given too much "time". If something inconsequential is played out in-scene, change it into exposition. If something is in exposition that is important to the story, go back and make it a scene. Pivotal moments in a piece should almost always take up more "time", signifying to the reader that this is it
For example, if Molly and Bob are your main characters, and the defining moment in the narrative is where Molly tells Bob her big secret, the story should not told, "Molly turned and whispered in Bob's ear that she had cut her own hair, and only blamed it on her father because she knew Bob hated it."
Instead, the scene might read:
The restaurant was dark but Molly could see Bob staring at her. She reached up to touch the few strands of hair that still grazed her neck.
"I'm sorry," Bob said. It was true. He had loved her hair.
Molly blushed, pulling gently at the short ends, as if sheer will would make them grow. It had been such a mistake. His eyes said everything.
"You're father is a monster," he said, trying to focus on the rest of her beauty, but kept getting lost in the space around her. If he squinted, he could imagine the dark hair that once framed her face, fell down upon her shoulders, the small pieces that curved into the valley of her collar bone.
Molly looked down and thought of her small, kind father.
"It's all my fault," Molly said.
"It will grow," Bob said quickly, hoping that his face did not show how he loved her less.
"I did it," she said, closing her eyes. She could not stand what she knew she would see when she opened them.

Thoughts on the MFA: A Breakdown of Things to Consider

Tuesday April 15, 2014

Recently I was asked to be on a panel for the Columbia MFA Program called "Life After the MFA" with a number of other writers who had graduated from the Program. Each panelist had a different experience, but we all seemed to be happy with the choice we made to attend.
Having had a good experience myself, I have encouraged my most talented students to apply to MFA Programs. For the most part, I believe they have had a positive experience as well.
Click here for some tips and more thoughts on the process of getting into and attending MFA Programs.

The Truth in Fiction

Saturday April 5, 2014

Take the truth. The minute I put it down on paper, it is my truth, and that truth is a narrative, a piece of fiction, a story. The difference between non-fiction and fiction is the heading and the work: in non-fiction, by the fact of stating it is true, it has credibility and therefore can seem unbelievable; for fiction, the writer must make you believe the story is true whether it is or isn't.
The truth in fiction is not what has physically happened, but the emotion behind it. My goal as a writer is to make the reader feel something, to evoke a response. What you feel is the truth inside you, not necessarily the logistics of the story.
The truth outside me is something different altogether. The truth outside me needs to be written so that it reads as "real." In fiction, I cannot defend my story when someone says it's unbelievable, by saying, "But it really happened!" This is one of the first rules in my fiction class: you can never say whether or not it is true.

So if the truth doesn't matter, but the truth of the story does, how does a writer make their work believable?

I never want to lose my reader: once something in my story is unbelievable, the reader is taken "out". Suddenly, there is laundry to do, a car to move...no longer are they in the world I have created with my words. But if you do not deviate from your voice, if you are consistent in your storytelling, your reader will not second guess your "truth." Above all else, no matter what kind of story or genre or style you are writing in, if you are consistent in the way you have chosen to write (even if you are consistent in your inconsistency) the reader will go where you take them.

Take the truth. Another way the truth factors into ones' fiction is where you decide to use it. Your life is filled with "fiction-worthy" moments. Your past and your present. Start to carry around a small notebook. It can fit in your back pocket or your purse. Write down your dreams, ideas, overheard conversations, observations from the world as you experience them. When you are faced with an empty page, look back on your notes to inspire you. Combine "truths." Take the one moment in which action transcends the physical and becomes an emotion. This is how you make a reader "feel."

Take the truth. People often ask me whether my stories have happened or not. I think it is often hard for a reader to connect a person with their writing, or if they feel an intimacy with a character, to reconcile it with the writer who invented them. But I am a fiction writer. What happens in my stories are things that I know. They are not necessarily things that have happened, and if they have happened, they are still my own.
The emotions in my writing are the truth. If I can make you feel something, then I have done my job.

One Last Post

Wednesday April 18, 2012

I'm sorry to say that this will be my last post as your guide here. Due to changing circumstances in other parts of my life I will no longer have the time to give this site the attention it deserves.

My brief stay here has been fun and rewarding and I'm sorry to have to go so soon. I've learned a lot and really enjoyed getting to know many of you.

I wish you all the best in your writing adventures!


©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.